Legal Opinion

Morasch v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Petitioner sought post-conviction review of a 1932 misdemeanor conviction. On the state’s motion, his petition for post-conviction relief was stricken in the circuit court. Pursuant to ORS 138.660 ① the Court of Appeals dismissed petitioner’s appeal without a hearing on the authority of Rupp v. State, 1 Or App 521, 463 P2d 604 (1970); review denied 1970. We granted review to consider the availability of post-conviction relief in misdemeanor cases after the sentence has been served and the petitioner released from custody.

In Rupp the Court of Appeals held that a post-conviction proceeding was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. STATE Ex Rel APPLING v. CHASEOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. City of Klamath FallsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. E.C. v. Virginia Dep't of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  3. Morasch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API