Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided November 7, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Colonel Steve Dozier, Director Arkansas State Police 1 State Police Plaza Drive Little Rock, AR 72209-4822

Dear Colonel Dozier:

I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following questions:

1. How do Act 968 and Act 1923 of 2005 alter the law regarding the releaseability of sealed/expunged convictions for non-criminal justice purposes?

2. Does Act 1923 totally override and supersede Act 968 due to the fact that Act 1923 was passed after Act 968 during the session?

You note in your request that both acts amend the provisions of former A.C.A. § 20-48-804 (Supp. 2003), which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Donoho v. DonohoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Love v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Daniels v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API