Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Board of Regents of University of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

This is another case in which a doctor’s license to practice medicine has been revoked solely upon the testimony of paid departmental investigators. The effect of such evidence has been discussed in Matter of Weinstein v. Board of Regents (267 App. Div. 4), decided herewith. Here each investigator with obvious falsity, denied that she sought to trap petitioner, although each admitted that she gave him a false name and falsely stated to him that she was pregnant. Neither investigator was actually pregnant and one had passed the menopause. An abortion was never mentioned. The evidence is quite…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Weinstein v. Board of Regents of University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Zimmerman v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Epstein v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API