Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Board of Regents of University of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

This is a review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of a determination of the Board of Regents suspending petitioner’s license to practice medicine for two years. He practiced at No. 1050 Herkimer St., Brooklyn. The proof relied upon to sustain the determination was given by Gertrude Datz, a special investigator of the Department of Education since June, 1932, who received five dollars a day when she *6worked. She first called upon a Dr. Schlossman on Willoughby Avenue in Brooklyn on February 17, 1941, giving a fictitious name, Mrs. Ann Greenberg, and understating her age, also falsely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winston v. . WinstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Yates v. . YatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Schwartz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Board of Regents of University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Zimmerman v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Epstein v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API