Legal Opinion

State v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1927PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVeRMiiaoN, J.

-The appellant was charged by indictment with a violation of Section 5080 of the Code of 1924. That section, so far as here material, is as follows:

“No person shall: * * * Possess a motor vehicle the serial or engine number of which is defaced, altered, or tampered with.”

Section 5081 provides punishment by imprisonment or the imposition of a fine for a violation of the preceding section.

I. By requested instructions, which were refused, and by exceptions to the instructions given to the jury, the question is presented whether knowledge on the part of one in possession of a motor vehicle of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Commonwealth v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. State v. DrummerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API