Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided January 20, 1998No. 96-1192PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
This is a civil pattern or practice action filed pursuant to §§ 706 and 707 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) against Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”), alleging that Mitsubishi is liable for hostile work environment sexual harassment, quid pro quo sexual harassment, gender discrimination, retaliation, and constructive discharge at its auto assembly plant located in Normal, Illinois. The Complaint…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Alch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Nelson v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Anderson v. CornejoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Warnell v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.