Legal Opinion

Bozeman v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 16, 2006No. 1:03-cv-03970PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VINING, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiffs Motion to Exceed Page Limitation and Correct Record Testimony [Doc. No. 300] is GRANTED; the defendants’ Motion for Leave to Increase Page Limit [Doc. No. 301] is GRANTED.

After making a de novo review of the record and after carefully considering the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, together with the objections thereto, the court receives it with approval and adopts it as the opinion and order of this court.

FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Attached is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  2. Mabry v. Neighborhood Defender ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  4. Genberg v. PorterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  5. Malin v. Siemens Medical Solutions Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API