Legal Opinion
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 19, 2008No. 3:07-cr-02000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MATTERS FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBERS 4,439,759; 4,763,356; 4,958,226; AND 5,347,295; INCLUDING:(1) MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, NEW TRIAL, OR REMITTITUR; AND(2) RULINGS ON EQUITABLE MATTERS TRIED TO THE COURT
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
This order addresses the remaining post-trial questions in this case, including motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), motions for new trial, and rulings on equitable matters tried to the Court. The trial involved four United States Patents: 4,439,759 (“Fleming '759” or “'759”); 4,763,356 (“Day '356” or…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Ergotron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Edward Venard v. Jackson Hole Paragliding, LLC, a Wyoming LLC, Tom Bartlett, Scott Harris, Matt Combs, Jon Hunt, Andrew Frye, and Jeff CoulterWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009