Legal Opinion

Jack Hanratty and Ellen Elizabeth Pool v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1955No. 15106_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were convicted of (1) conspiring to transport forged securities in interstate commerce, and (2) causing to be so transported a falsely made and forged security, namely a $400 cashier’s cheek. The grounds of this appeal are that appellants maintain that there was no substantial evidence to support the verdict, and a verdict of acquittal should have been directed; and that appellants were deprived of a fair trial because women were excluded from the jury.

The evidence against the appellants was briefly as follows: Han-ratty, owner of a San Antonio bar, had in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Quinones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  4. Glover v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Johnson v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1958
  3. Halfen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Jack H. Halfen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. L. Clayton Rivers, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API