Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1968No. Civ. No 32518PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiffs-vendees sued for damages resulting from assertedly fraudulent misrepresentations by defendant-vendor in a transaction involving the sale and removal of a house and garage. They appeal from judgment rendered in favor of defendant.

Certain background facts are found in Clinton v. 4911 Van Nuys, Ltd., 212 Cal.App.2d 703 [28 Cal.Rptr. 170], decided by another division of this court; parenthetically, the above reported decision, as well as the trial court’s findings and judgment in the prior proceeding, are annexed to plaintiffs’ complaint herein. They state that “In August 1957 Van Nuys…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Disner v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API