O'Rear v. Lamb
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
Whether or not the prayer of the defendants for an accounting, where, as here, the pleadings show an involved and confused course of dealings over a period of twenty years, would under the Code, § 37-301, give equity jurisdiction in this case (see Wilson v. Granger, 134 Ga. 680, 68 S. E. 514; Wimpee v. Burt, 148 Ga. 418 (2), 96 S. E. 993), the allegations of the amended petition and the prayer for specific performance make this case one in equity. Code, § 37-801. The judgment on demurrer, striking those portions of the amended petition containing and dependent upon the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Brightwell v. Oglethorpe Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Trust Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Baxter & Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pinkard v. MendelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Irwin v. DaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Nickelson v. OwenbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. FalligantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.