Legal Opinion
Pinkard v. Mendel
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 10, 1960No. 20977PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
On December 11, 1957, Simon Mendel and Mrs. Sarah Koplin, Trustees of Trust “B” of the last will and testament of Hyman Mendel, as successor lessees of certain described property located on Houston Street in the City of Atlanta, occupied and subleased by Carithers-Wallace-Courtenay, Inc., filed their suit in Fulton Superior Court for a declaratory judgment and an injunction against Mrs. D. E. Pinkard and Mrs. S. T. Leathers, successor lessors, the petition alleging that a lease contract was entered into for a period beginning October 15, 1909, and running for 99 years, a copy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shippen v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Rowan v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Sumner v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- McCallum v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- State of Georgia v. Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co. v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Poole v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- George v. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- LaSalle National Insurance v. PophamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.