Ex Parte Hill
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, HERVEY and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
We filed and set this application for a writ of habeas corpus to determine if applicant was improperly classified as “not eligible for mandatory-supervision release.” We deny relief, but note that applicant is only temporarily ineligible. On May 6, 2005, a parole panel reviewed applicant for release on mandatory supervision, but it concluded that (1) applicant’s accrued good conduct time is not an accurate reflection of his potential for rehabilitation, and (2) his release would endanger the public. It therefore…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte GeikenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ex Parte RetzlaffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ex Parte ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Ex Parte ShookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
4Cited by10 opinions
- Andrus v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
- Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Gill v. LumpkinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- Hill, Michael AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Johnson v. WainwrightDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.