Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Retzlaff

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 2004No. 74,772PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

We withdraw our previous opinion and substitute this opinion. The constitutional issue presented in this writ application is whether notice that a person will be reviewed for release on mandatory supervision at some unspecified time “before [his] projected release date” constitutes timely notice consistent with due process. We hold that it does not.

I

Applicant was convicted of Possession of a Weapon in a Prohibited Place1 in March 1998 and sentenced to eight years in prison. He was eligible for release on discretionary…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ex Parte GeikenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Ex Parte ShookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

4Cited by71 opinions

  1. Tony Ray Coleman v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Teague v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Ex Parte ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Ex parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API