Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ervin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 2005No. AP-74,985PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

in which WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

We filed and set this application for a writ of habeas corpus to determine whether the applicant was improperly denied release to mandatory supervision. We deny relief because we conclude that the applicant’s prior conviction for sexual abuse precludes mandatory supervision release because it is a predecessor to an offense enumerated in Government Code Section 508.149(a).

I. Facts

The applicant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance and pleaded true to an enhancement paragraph alleging a prior…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte RetzlaffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

4Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThompsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Ex Parte KellerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Ex Parte NoyolaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Ex Parte ByrdCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Naranjo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API