Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Patelos Door Corporation
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 25, 1968No. Civ. 931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LARKINS, District Judge:
SUMMARY
This is an action instituted by the Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, under the provisions of Section 16(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) pursuant to the written request of Royce R. Joyner, Jessie Turnage, Robert T. Wilson, and Deleon L. Best. Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant Patelos Door Corporation unpaid overtime compensation allegedly due Joyner, Turnage, Wilson and Best as a result of their employment with Patelos, alleging that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fanelli v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Marshall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Fight v. Armour and Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Town of North Kingstown v. Rhode Island State Lab. Rel. Bd., 97-0679 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001