Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 9, 1980No. 77 C 2140PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIFTON, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 217 to restrain violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (the “Act”), specifically, failure to pay overtime compensation said to be due certain employees of defendant pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 207 and failure to keep related records pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 211(c) in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(2) and (a)(5), respectively. Trial of the case was conducted before the undersigned, sitting without a jury, during the week of April 7, 1980. What follows sets forth this Court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruce Barcellona, Cross-Appellants v. Tiffany English Pub, Inc., D/B/A Tgi Friday's, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Clougher v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- American Restaurant Group v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.