Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Huff v. Sauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1955No. 36,434PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Petitioner, Lloyd W. Huff, brings action against Philip Sauer, W. J. James, and Otto R. Erickson, members of the police civil service commission for the city of Bemidji, and the city of Bemidji, respondents, for a declaratory judgment determining his rights and status under the police civil service commission of Bemidji and nullifying an order of such commission terminating his employment as a city police patrolman.

Respondents moved to dismiss the action on the ground that (1) the court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter; (2) the petition constituted a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. United States v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Oliver v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. The Marckel Co. v. ZitzowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stockton v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Vroman v. City of SoldotnaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RoarkCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. State v. HollowayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Rachford v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API