Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hoyman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1989No. 1380PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This submitted case is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s second collateral petition for relief from his conviction for rape. The petition was erroneously filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9551 (hereinafter “PCHA”), which was modified in part, repealed in part, and renamed the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541, et seq., eff. April 13, 1988, by Act of April 13, 1988, No. 47, §§ 3-4, 1988 Pa.Legis.Srv. 229-232 (hereinafter “PCRA”). The relief sought by appellant is a nunc pro tunc direct appeal to this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. MarkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. MostellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API