Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Walton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 27, 2002No. 00-1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

535 U.S. 212 (2002)

BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

v.

WALTON

No. 00-1937.

United States Supreme Court.

Argued January 16, 2002.

Decided March 27, 2002.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

2Opinion of the Court · BreyerBreyer, J.

Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, post, p. 226.

Jeffrey A. Lamken argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Olson, Assistant Attorney General McCallum, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, John C. Hoyle, and Mark S. Davies.

Kathryn L. Pryor argued the cause for respondent. With her on the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Breyer; Concurring in the judgment.

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Voss v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API