Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Maust

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1991No. 1-88-2109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Defendant David Maust (defendant) made incriminating statements, regarding his involvement in a 1981 Chicago homicide for which he had not yet been charged, during custodial interrogation initiated by officers of the Cook County sheriff’s police. At the time he gave these statements, defendant was in custody in a Texas prison for an unrelated criminal charge that had been filed against him in that State, and local counsel had been appointed to represent him regarding that offense.

After defendant made the incriminating remarks to Cook County authorities regarding the Chicago murder, he was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. People v. MakielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. State v. ForbushWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. MakielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API