Legal Opinion

State v. Forbush

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2011No. 08AP3007-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1.

We review a published decision of the court of appeals1 reversing the circuit court's2 order granting Brad Forbush's (Forbush) motion to suppress statements he made during a police interrogation. The central issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S._, 129 S. Ct. 2079 (2009), requires us to overrule Wiscon*625sin precedent that established the parameters of a charged defendant's right to counsel in Wisconsin when a defendant, who has affirmatively invoked his constitutional right to counsel by retaining and receiving the services of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RivasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. VerhagenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  3. State v. Jesse J. DelebreauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. DelebreauCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  5. State v. Nhia LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API