State v. Forbush
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 1.
We review a published decision of the court of appeals1 reversing the circuit court's2 order granting Brad Forbush's (Forbush) motion to suppress statements he made during a police interrogation. The central issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S._, 129 S. Ct. 2079 (2009), requires us to overrule Wiscon*625sin precedent that established the parameters of a charged defendant's right to counsel in Wisconsin when a defendant, who has affirmatively invoked his constitutional right to counsel by retaining and receiving the services of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RivasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. VerhagenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- State v. Jesse J. DelebreauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DelebreauCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. Nhia LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.