Legal Opinion

Atyeo v. Paulsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1982No. 13497PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

Charles Atyeo and William Atyeo, d/b/a Atyeo Brothers (appellants), appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court pursuant to a jury trial with regard to an alleged oral lease agreement between the parties pertaining to farming rights on certain realty. This judgment was against Marjorie B. Paulsen and Willis Gerth (ap-pellees) in the amount of $270.00; appellants were also awarded $205.50 in court costs. Appellants contend that the trial court, by erroneously instructing the jury, effectively precluded their claim for relief.1 We reverse and remand.

*165FACTS

Appellants…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Twyman v. RoellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Olesen v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wolf v. GraberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rozeboom v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kreager v. Blomstrom Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gerlach v. Ethan Coop Lumber Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API