Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez-Castillo

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 17, 2003No. 02-1879PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, defendant-appellant Elmer C. Rodríguez-Castillo (Rodriguez) raises questions concerning the operation of former Rule 16(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 and the imposition of his sentence. Concluding that his arguments lack merit, we affirm the judgment below.

We glean the relevant facts from the change-of-plea colloquy, the presentence investigation report (PSI Report), and the transcript of the disposition hearing. See United States v. Brewster, 127 F.3d 22, 23 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Dietz, 950 F.2d 50, 51 (1st Cir.1991). In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. William A. DietzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Julio La Guardia, United States of America v. Eredia Josefa Jimenez-MinallaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Fornia-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. NewbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Carrasquillo-PenalozaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API