Legal Opinion

United States v. Newbert

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 11, 2007No. 07-1387PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

In this case we decline to enforce a defendant’s waiver of rights contained in a plea agreement.

It has become common for the prosecution to require that plea agreements which *182defendants enter contain a waiver of constitutional and statutory rights. The Supreme Court has, in specific contexts, upheld the practice. See, e.g., United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629-33, 122 S.Ct. 2450, 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002) (defendant can waive right to government’s required disclosure of evidence related to any affirmative defense or impeachment of witnesses); United States v. Mezzanatto,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Borrero-AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Meece v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. United States v. QuirogaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. IsomCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Acosta-RomanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API