United States v. Newbert
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
In this case we decline to enforce a defendant’s waiver of rights contained in a plea agreement.
It has become common for the prosecution to require that plea agreements which *182defendants enter contain a waiver of constitutional and statutory rights. The Supreme Court has, in specific contexts, upheld the practice. See, e.g., United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629-33, 122 S.Ct. 2450, 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002) (defendant can waive right to government’s required disclosure of evidence related to any affirmative defense or impeachment of witnesses); United States v. Mezzanatto,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Borrero-AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Meece v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. QuirogaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. IsomCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Acosta-RomanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.