McCallum v. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service of N.C. Carolina State University
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
The denial of summary judgment is not a final judgment, but rather is interlocutory in nature. We do not review interlocutory orders as a matter of course. Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 361-62, 57 S.E.2d 377, 381, reh’g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). If, however, “the trial court’s decision deprives the appellant of a substantial right which would be lost absent immediate reviewf,]” we may review the appeal under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-277(a) and 7A-27(d)(1). N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. Page, 119 N.C. App. 730, 734, 460 S.E.2d 332, 334 (1995). The moving party…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Foster v. CrandellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Estate of Earley Ex Rel. Earley v. Haywood County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Radcliffe v. Avenel Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.