Tatum v. Iowa Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is to quiet title. The complaint is in the usual form and the answer avers title by virtue of an administrator’s sale, and it pleads the bar of section 1573 of the' Code of Civil Procedure. One Abisha S. Hudson, at the time of his death, held the title in fee and was in possession of the land, and the same was the community property of himself and wife, Rose E. Hudson. Decedent left a will wherein he appointed his wife and his niece, Mary F. Park, executrices of said will. Said will was admitted to probate, by the superior court of Kern County, on May 11, 1908, and, on said day, by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Meeks v. OlphertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Gilder v. WarfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1941