Artime v. Brotman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, J.
Jorge Artime appeals the dismissal of his cause of action for lack of prosecution. Because we conclude that the operative event is the filing of the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal.
In 1989, attorney Marc C. Brotman filed a lawsuit on Artime’s behalf against Bruce Lamberto and others, and obtained a jury verdict for $32,000 with interest. The trial court entered final judgment on April 24, 1995 in Artime’s favor against Lamberto. This Court reversed, holding that Artime had failed to demonstrate record activity in the lawsuit for more than a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Dade County v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Frohman v. Bar-OrSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Peterzell v. James Urbach, M.D., P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Lamberto v. ArtimeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Izquierdo v. Hillsborough County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006