Legal Opinion

Lamberto v. Artime

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1996No. 95-1474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment for the appellee-plaintiff under review is reversed because no good cause — by way of cognizable non-record activity or otherwise — was demonstrated to justify the failure of the predecessor trial judge to dismiss the case under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) after a period of more than one year had elapsed without record activity. Public Health Trust v. Diaz, 529 So.2d 682 (Fla.1988); Tosar v. Sladek, 393 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); F.M.C. Corp. v. Chatman, 368 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 203 (Fla.1979); Dade County v. Moreno, 227 So.2d 548…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. ChatmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Tosar v. SladekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Dade County v. MorenoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Artime v. BrotmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API