Frohman v. Bar-Or
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
660 So.2d 633 (1995)
Elaine FROHMAN, etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
Stella BAR-OR, et al., Respondents.
No. 84038.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 29, 1995.
Rehearing Denied September 20, 1995.
Michael B. Solomon of Michael B. Solomon, P.A., Hallandale, for petitioner.
H. Taylor White, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
HARDING, Justice.
We have for review the following question certified to be of great public importance:
DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.420(e) APPLY TO A POST-TRIAL PROCEEDING SUCH AS A MOTION FOR A DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT IN A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE SUIT?
Frohman v. Bar-Or, 637 So.2d 369…
Also in this document: Dissent · Grimes; Dissent · Grimes.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA v. PoletzSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Chrysler Leasing Corporation v. PassacantilliSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Riesgo v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Withers v. Flagship Peoples BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ravel v. RavelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Knauss v. DwekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Park Finance of Broward, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.