In the Interest of M.N.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, Justice MEDINA, and Justice GREEN joined.
In this case the trial court terminated the parental rights of M.N.’s mother and appointed the Department of Family and Protective Services as managing conservator. The mother’s statement of points for appeal required by section 263.405 of the Texas Family Code was filed late, but the trial court granted an extension of time and concluded that the statement of points was filed timely. The court of appeals held that section 263.405 did not allow…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Banda v. Garcia Ex Rel. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Matthew Lippincott and Creg Parks v. Warren WhisenhuntTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co., Bnsf Railway Co., and Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. City of Houston, Texas and Daniel Krueger, in His Official Capacity as Director of Public Works and EngineeringTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.