Legal Opinion
Knox & Shouse v. Knox
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 1925No. 16329PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, 0.
The petitioners have appealed from an order of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation to the claimant, Earl Knox, on account of injuries sustained by him on July 30, 1924, while in the employ of the Knox & Shouse partnership. The findings of the Commission were as follows:
“That on the 30th day of July, 1924, Earl Knox and Frank Shouse were members of a copartnership engaged in the operation of a hazardous industry covered by and subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to wit, the drilling of oil wells and work incident thereto; that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Grace v. VaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brooks v. A. A. Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Stephens Produce Company v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Gebers v. Murfreesboro Laundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Superior Insurance Company v. KlingTexas Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.