Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Ammons

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1948No. 5897PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMPKIN, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court of Lubbock County, Texas, in which the appellants, Forth Worth and-Denver City Railway Company and Fort Worth & Denver South Plains Railway Company, are perpetually enjoined and restrained from extending an industrial spur track into a C district as designated by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lubbock, or from entering upon any 'construction or extension of their tracks without obtaining a permit from the City of Lubbock as required by the City’s Building Code. The judgment declares that the Zoning Ordinance is a valid…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. City of Beaumont v. FallTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Texas Midstream Gas Services, LLC v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. Ware, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  3. Porter v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Cypress Forest Public Utility District v. Kleinwood Municipal Utility District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API