Legal Opinion

Berman v. Crook

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 2, 2018No. Case No: 16–cv–2153–RCLPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In support of his claims, Mr. Berman argues that Ms. Morris knew, prior to launching the criminal investigation, that a document existed that refuted her theory of criminal misconduct, but she never disclosed the document to the grand jury. He further states that the search warrant affidavit signed by Mr. Crook contained false allegations, and absent those false allegations, the affidavit could not support a finding of probable cause. Turning to the 2003 civil case, Mr. Berman states that Ms. Rabinowitz used materials gained from the illegal search to support the government's case and notes…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Allen v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Fontanez v. BerberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Holley v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Jacksonville Urban League, Inc. v. Azar, IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API