Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Geduldig

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1986No. S.F. 24601PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

In a taxpayer’s suit, defendants Dwight Geduldig, Charles Hobbs and Lewis Uhler were found personally liable to the State *28of California for the unlawful expenditure of state funds.1 We reverse the judgment, holding (1) that because cash expenditures from the state agencies involved were reimbursed from funds appropriated for the Governor’s office, the agencies incurred no damage on which to predicate liability, and (2) the evidence before the trial court was insufficient to support a judgment based on in-kind contributions of personnel and material. Our opinion follows in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blain v. Doctor's Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. League of Women Voters v. Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Stevens v. GeduldigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API