Legal Opinion

State v. Dugee

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

Evidence was introduced by the prosecution in its opening ease. When the State rested, the respondent moved that he be discharged “because there was no evidence to go to the jury to substantiate the offense charged, or to prove it in any legal way.” The motion was overruled and exception allowed. Thereupon, respondent also rested his case.

Evidence introduced by the prosecution tended to show that on December 11 the Marmon touring ear on which were number plates (“No. 65-814, Vermont”) attached that were not assigned to it by the Secretary of State, with two men in it, was pursued by three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  2. State v. MarstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. UnwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. State v. Coomer, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Belock v. State Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API