Legal Opinion
United States v. Tortorello
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 1972No. 70 CR 884PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLACK, District Judge.
The Motion Before the Court
The defendants Arthur Tortorello (a/k/a Artie Todd) and John Dennett moved before trial to suppress tape recorded evidence obtained by electronic surveillance pursuant to state court, orders made in 1969. The defendants contended that the state court orders were improperly i) sought, ii) granted, iii) renewed, and iv) executed. In addition, having- been advised on March 10, 1972, that from 1961 to 1963 Tortorello had been the subject of F.B.I. electronic surveillance in which trespass was involved, Tortorello contends that the 1961-63 federal…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A "Paulie," Odell Miller, A/K/A "Pluggy," John Radice, and John PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Andrea Aiello, A/K/A "Antonio Aiello", Francesca Bartolotta, Lorenzo ScadutoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. TraitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Evelio MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.