Legal Opinion
Hendrickson v. Magney Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1987No. C1-86-1302PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Ernest Hendrickson commenced this action in December 1982 against his former employer, respondent Magney Construction Company, for discrimination on the basis of disability and age in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 363.03, subd. 1(2) and 181.81 (1980) and for breach of contract. Trial was bifurcated. The breach of contract claims were tried first to a jury, and the discrimination claims were heard later by the court. This appeal is from two post-trial orders and from the judgment subsequently entered in favor of Magney Construction. We affirm.
FACTS
Hendrickson…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- ZCD Transportation, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Renne v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muller v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Covey v. Detroit Lakes Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Bruss v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- McClure v. Davis Engineering, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006