Legal Opinion
Muller v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 17, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
786 A.2d 143 (2001)
345 N.J. Super. 595
Arthur MULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 2001.
Decided December 17, 2001.
Neil H. Deutsch, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Deutsch, Resnick, Green & Grabell, attorneys; Mr. Deutsch and Jonathan Nirenberg, on the brief).
Lawrence R. Maddock argued the cause for respondent (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; Mr. Maddock, on the brief).
Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN and AXELRAD.
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Clowes v. Terminix International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Michael A. Mengine v. Marvin Runyon, Post Master General, U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Terrell v. USAIRCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Victor v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Tynan v. VICINAGE 13 OF SUPERIOR CT.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Raspa v. Office of SheriffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Victor v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Bell v. KA Industrial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.