Legal Opinion

Stimpson v. Pond

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided October 15, 1855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIS. Circuit Justice.

This is an action of debt, founded on the act of August 29, 1S42, § 5, to recover penalties for marking the word “patent.” on an unpatented article, for the purpose of deceiving the public. The defendant has pleaded that the causes of action did not accrue within two years. In support of this plea he relies on the thirty-second section of the crimes act of April 30, 1790, which limits suits for penalties to two years after the fine or forfeiture incurred. Tin1 fourth section of the act of February 2S. 1S39 (5 Stat. 322), enacts, that no suit or prosecution shall be…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. StraubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. 3M Co. (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing) v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. 3m Company v. Carol M. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Carter v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  5. Carter v. New Orleans & N. E. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API