Legal Opinion

Discovision Associates v. Disc Manufacturing, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 26, 1998No. Civil Action 95-21-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff DiscoVision Associates (“DiscoVision”) filed this action against defendant Disc Manufacturing, Inc. (“DMI”) on January 17, 1995, alleging infringement of six DiscoVision patents relating to optical disc technology. (D.I.l) On September 20, 1995, DiscoVision filed an amended complaint which alleged that DMI infringed ten patents relating to optical disc technology. (D.I.63, 484) During discovery, DiscoVision voluntarily agreed to drop several of its patent claims. 1 (D.I. 287 at 14; D.I. 299 at 2; D.I. 308 at 2; D.I. 323 at 3)…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Omeprazole Patent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Rowe International Corp. v. Ecast, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  4. Wesley Jessen Corp. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  5. AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API