Legal Opinion
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 2007No. M-21-81 (BSJ); MDL Docket No. 1291; Nos. 00 Civ. 6749(BSJ), 03 Civ. 6057(BSJ), 00 Civ. 4541(BSJ), 03 Civ. 8719(BSJ), 01 Civ. 9351(BSJ), 00 Civ. 7597(BSJ), 01 Civ. 2998(BSJ)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge.
*387TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION. CO CO o
I. The Parties. CO CO o
II. The Patents-In-Suit. 03 05 CO
A. Patent Ownership. CO CO
III. The Pleadings. CO CO
A. Complaint Against Mylan/Esteve. CO 05 CO
B. Complaints Against Lek. CO CO
C. Complaint Against Apotex. 00 05 CO
D. Complaints Against Impax. CO CO 00
DISCUSSION. CO CO CO
I. Daubert Motions. 05 05 CO
A. Choice of Law. CO CO CO
B. Legal Requirements Under Daubert and Rule 702. o o
C. Expert Qualifications . 1. Plaintiffs’ Expert Witnesses . o o to to
D. Daubert Analysis Applies to Weight and Credibility.
II.…
2Cases cited172 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Omeprazole Patent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Focus Products Group International, LLC v. Kartri Sales Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020