Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Travelers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1994No. 94-20423UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Brad Taylor appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Travelers Insurance Company (“Travelers”) on the issue of the duty to defend. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
The Case Corporation (“Case”) hired Brad-Taylor through his business, the Taylor System of Houston, to remove ferrous oxide from hundreds of car exteriors that were damaged while parked at the Case plant in Racine, Wisconsin. Taylor began the repairs at the Case facility on April 11,1989. Chemicals were used to remove the ferrous oxide, but unfortunately, damage was caused…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnett v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Rose Ana Forbes Lemelle, Rose Ana Forbes Lemelle v. Universal Mfg. Corp., Universal Mfg. Corp., Werts Novelty Co., Inc., Usf & GCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. McManusTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Adamo v. State Farm Lloyds Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. Calli Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Southwest Tank & Treater Manufacturing Co. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- American Equity Insurance v. Castlemane Farms, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Classic Performance Cars, Inc. v. Acceptance Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Third Coast Packaging Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.