Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Third Coast Packaging Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Mid-Continent Casualty Company’s First Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines the motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On April 30, 2002, a fire occurred at a Third Coast Packaging Company, Inc. (“Third Coast”) facility, causing damage to the facility and surrounding property. Third Coast incurred various expenses fighting the fire, monitoring the site, and performing site clean-up. In the aftermath of the fire, a number of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. v. Boston Basement Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. v. Boston Basement Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Pin Oak Centre, Ltd. v. the Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006