Legal Opinion
Tufaro v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 1991No. 9257PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the defendant employer is obligated to continue the group benefits plan insurance coverage for the plaintiff’s dependents while the plaintiff continues to receive workers’ compensation benefits under General Statutes § 31-275 et seq.
*235The facts underlying this claim are not in dispute. On or about June 26, 1984, the plaintiff injured her hand and wrist in a conveyor belt accident at the defendant’s Norwalk plant. While the plaintiff was on medical leave, the defendant continued to provide group hospital, major medical and dental insurance coverage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Vincent v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Dealmeida v. M.C.M. Stamping Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Mulroy v. Becton Dickinson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.