Legal Opinion

Connors v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 1, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is an action of contract by an assessor of taxes, who serves part time, for an alleged deficiency in salary payments made to him by the defendant city between March 2, 1952, and December 8, 1954. The plaintiff was actually paid $59.64 a week but, under the applicable ordinance, contends that he should have been paid an additional $28.63 a week. The case was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were to be final. The judge ordered judgment for the plaintiff, for the amount claimed, on the auditor’s report, and the defendant appealed.

The plaintiff has been an assessor since March,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Mayor of Gloucester v. City Clerk of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. City Manager of Medford v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wasserman v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Engel v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Equitable Credit Corp. v. TreadwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Wessinger v. H. Werner Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Schooner Dartmouth, Inc. v. PiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API