Legal Opinion

City Manager of Medford v. Civil Service Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 29, 1952PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The declaratory judgment statute is invoked seeking, in part, that “an interpretation be made as to the status of the membership of the offices of assessors” of Medford. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231A, inserted by St. 1945, c. 582, § 1. The defendants are the civil service commission, the director of civil service, the commissioner of corporations and taxation, Samuel D. Potts, Alfred Calabrese, and James Connors “as they constitute the board of assessors of the city of Medford,” and Michael Catino and Curtis S. Leonard, who, with Connors, have been temporarily designated to act as assessors by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Mayor of Gloucester v. City Clerk of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Hobart v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Karchmar v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Wheeler v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Jacobson v. Parks & Recreation Commission of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Court Street Parking Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Williams v. KaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API