Legal Opinion

Schooner Dartmouth, Inc. v. Piper

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

This is an action of tort or contract for damages resulting from reliance on a representation in respect of the coverage afforded by an insurance policy on the Schooner Dartmouth, owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s appeal, under G. L. c. 231, § 96, is from the order allowing the defendant’s motion fpr judgment for the defendant on the auditor’s report. The reference to the auditor provided that the findings of facts were to be final. The declaration was in two counts. The plaintiff, before *348any testimony was taken, waived count 1 of its declaration, sounding in tort (“representations . .…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chatham Furnace Co. v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Capucci v. BaroneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Pietrazak v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Rayden Engineering Corp. v. ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Abrams v. Reynolds Metals Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rozen v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Abdallah v. BoumilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API