Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Fink
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGoldrick, J.
The complaint alleges ownership in fee by the plaintiff of the lands described; that the defendant by and with the consent of the plaintiff, used and occupied the premises for carrying on his business from November 23, 1915, to November 1, 1924, and still uses and occupies said premises; that the use of the premises for said period is reasonably worth $41,952.15; and refusal to pay said sum upon demand.
The facts thus pleaded suffice to spell out the existence by implication of the conventional relation of landlord and tenant. (Collyer v. Collyer, 113 N. Y. 442.)
Upon defendant’s demand…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Collyer v. . CollyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Preston v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- De Camp v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Lamb v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Belakjon v. HilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Christatos v. United Cigar Stores Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
- Rand Products Co. v. MintzCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Ministers of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1991
- New York State Teachers' Retirement System v. HubertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.