Legal Opinion
Rand Products Co. v. Mintz
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 6, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarry T. Nusbaum, J.
The issue to be determined in this action is whether the defendants who acquired title to heavy machinery and equipment located on premises formerly leased to and occupied by a now bankrupt subtenant can be held accountabl for either the fair rental value, the use and occupancy of, *1056or for storage charges during the period the machinery and equipment remains on the premises.
These are the pertinent facts which gave rise to the problem. The plaintiff, a tenant of the entire building premises located at 833 Shepherd Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, subleased such premises to the Linden Backing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Camp v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Nims v. . Mayor, Etc., of the City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Bunke v. . New York Telephone CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Castle v. ArmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
- Ministers of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1991
- Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Marrano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.